The review
I keep saying the pacing is the flaw and I keep watching it again anyway. The score does about half the work and I have made peace with that.The breakdown
Subjective 5/5 · 25%
Story & Writing 4/5 · 12%
Acting 4.5/5 · 10%
Cinematography 5/5 · 8%
Directing 5/5 · 7%
Compared to everything 5/5 · 7%
Music & Sound 5/5 · 6%
Quality over time 4/5 · 7%
Compared to its genre 5/5 · 5%
Costume & Production Design 5/5 · 4%
Special Effects 4.5/5 · 4%
Pacing & Editing 3.5/5 · 5%
Each bar is that pillar's share of the score, after the weights were renormalised over the pillars that were actually rated.
Quality over time
Sticks the landing · averaging 4.03 of 5
Rate it this elsewhere
The number to enter on each platform, calibrated to how its users actually rate.
IMDb
9/10
Letterboxd
4.5★
- Fresh
Rotten Tomatoes
4.5★
TMDB
9.5/10
Percent
91.7%
The weights behind this score
Weights are relative, so each one is shown as a share of the whole profile. These are the weights this score was last computed with — a snapshot kept with the rating, not anybody's settings today.
- Conversion mode
- Calibrated
- Coverage
- 100% of the configured weight
| Pillar | Configured weight | Share of this score |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | 25.2% | 25% |
| Story & Writing | 11.8% | 12% |
| Acting | 10.1% | 10% |
| Cinematography | 8.4% | 8% |
| Directing | 6.7% | 7% |
| Compared to everything | 6.7% | 7% |
| Quality over time | 6.7% | 7% |
| Music & Sound | 5.9% | 6% |
| Pacing & Editing | 5% | 5% |
| Compared to its genre | 5% | 5% |
| Special Effects | 4.2% | 4% |
| Costume & Production Design | 4.2% | 4% |
Comments
0 top-level comments
No comments yet.