The review
Contains spoilers — tap to reveal
The genre changes about four times and the film never once loses its footing. The turn in the basement is the best structural trick I have seen this decade.The breakdown
Subjective 5/5 · 26%
Story & Writing 5/5 · 12%
Acting 5/5 · 11%
Cinematography 4.5/5 · 9%
Directing 5/5 · 7%
Compared to everything 5/5 · 7%
Quality over time 4.5/5 · 7%
Music & Sound 4.5/5 · 6%
Pacing & Editing 5/5 · 5%
Compared to its genre 5/5 · 5%
Costume & Production Design 4.5/5 · 4%
Each bar is that pillar's share of the score, after the weights were renormalised over the pillars that were actually rated.
Quality over time
Slow burn · averaging 4.5 of 5
Rate it this elsewhere
The number to enter on each platform, calibrated to how its users actually rate.
IMDb
10/10
Letterboxd
5.0★
- Fresh
Rotten Tomatoes
5.0★
TMDB
10.0/10
Percent
96.7%
The weights behind this score
Weights are relative, so each one is shown as a share of the whole profile. These are the weights this score was last computed with — a snapshot kept with the rating, not anybody's settings today.
- Conversion mode
- Calibrated
- Coverage
- 96% of the configured weight
| Pillar | Configured weight | Share of this score |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | 25.2% | 26% |
| Story & Writing | 11.8% | 12% |
| Acting | 10.1% | 11% |
| Cinematography | 8.4% | 9% |
| Directing | 6.7% | 7% |
| Compared to everything | 6.7% | 7% |
| Quality over time | 6.7% | 7% |
| Music & Sound | 5.9% | 6% |
| Pacing & Editing | 5% | 5% |
| Compared to its genre | 5% | 5% |
| Costume & Production Design | 4.2% | 4% |
| Special Effects | 4.2% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
Comments
0 top-level comments
No comments yet.