The review
Series two does something to the fourth wall that I have not stopped thinking about.The breakdown
Subjective 5/5 · 47%
Story & Writing 5/5 · 22%
Acting 5/5 · 19%
Quality over time 4.5/5 · 13%
Each bar is that pillar's share of the score, after the weights were renormalised over the pillars that were actually rated.
Quality over time
Slow burn · averaging 4.5 of 5
Rate it this elsewhere
The number to enter on each platform, calibrated to how its users actually rate.
IMDb
10/10
Letterboxd
5.0★
- Fresh
Rotten Tomatoes
5.0★
TMDB
10.0/10
Percent
98.4%
The weights behind this score
Weights are relative, so each one is shown as a share of the whole profile. These are the weights this score was last computed with — a snapshot kept with the rating, not anybody's settings today.
- Conversion mode
- Calibrated
- Coverage
- 54% of the configured weight
| Pillar | Configured weight | Share of this score |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | 25.2% | 47% |
| Story & Writing | 11.8% | 22% |
| Acting | 10.1% | 19% |
| Quality over time | 6.7% | 13% |
| Cinematography | 8.4% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Directing | 6.7% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Compared to everything | 6.7% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Music & Sound | 5.9% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Pacing & Editing | 5% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Compared to its genre | 5% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Special Effects | 4.2% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
| Costume & Production Design | 4.2% | Skipped, weight redistributed |
Comments
0 top-level comments
No comments yet.