Pulp Fiction (1994)
Based on 12 pillars · Sticks the landing
Bjørnar keeps their scores to themselves. The pillars and the weights below are proportions, not scores.
The review
not my cup of tea, but i see why some people like itThe breakdown
Subjective 2.5/5 · 25%
Story & Writing 3/5 · 12%
Cinematography 3/5 · 8%
Acting 2.5/5 · 10%
Quality over time 3.1/5 · 7%
Pacing & Editing 3/5 · 5%
Compared to its genre 3/5 · 5%
Music & Sound 2.5/5 · 6%
Special Effects 3/5 · 4%
Costume & Production Design 3/5 · 4%
Directing 2/5 · 7%
Compared to everything 1.5/5 · 7%
Each bar is that pillar's share of the score, after the weights were renormalised over the pillars that were actually rated.
Quality over time
Sticks the landing · averaging 3.08 of 5
The weights behind this score
Weights are relative, so each one is shown as a share of the whole profile. These are the weights this score was last computed with — a snapshot kept with the rating, not anybody's settings today.
- Conversion mode
- Calibrated
- Coverage
- 100% of the configured weight
| Pillar | Configured weight | Share of this score |
|---|---|---|
| Subjective | 25.2% | 25% |
| Story & Writing | 11.8% | 12% |
| Acting | 10.1% | 10% |
| Cinematography | 8.4% | 8% |
| Directing | 6.7% | 7% |
| Compared to everything | 6.7% | 7% |
| Quality over time | 6.7% | 7% |
| Music & Sound | 5.9% | 6% |
| Pacing & Editing | 5% | 5% |
| Compared to its genre | 5% | 5% |
| Special Effects | 4.2% | 4% |
| Costume & Production Design | 4.2% | 4% |
Comments
0 top-level comments
No comments yet.